martes, enero 23, 2024

Mojo Vs Rust, Basic Test And Binary Perspective.

Hello, In first place I'm not going to do an algorithmic benchmark, just a simple loop + print test and some checks on the generated binaries.

The system is a Debian12 Linux and the architecture is: x86 64bits.



Rust

Mojo


Mojo don't allow .py extension it has to be .mojo so no default nvim highlighting ...


$ mojo build mojo_benchmark.mojo

$ time ./mojo_benchmark

...

real 0m0.342s

user 0m0.080s

sys 0m0.252s



$ rustc rust_benchmark.rs

$ time ./rust_benchmark

...

real 0m0.107s

user 0m0.012s

sys 0m0.049s


I noticed a speed increase using fish shell instead of bash but could be the environment variable stack overload.


So in this specific test rust is much faster. And also the compiler suggests using _ instead i, that mojo compiler doesn't.

The rust binary is bigger, but is because the allocator is embedded:

-rwxr-xr-x 1 sha0 sha0 1063352 Jan 10 08:55 mojo_benchmark

-rwxr-xr-x 1 sha0 sha0 4632872 Jan 10 08:57 rust_benchmark


But Look this, mojo uses libstdc++ and libc  and rust only uses libc.

$ ldd -d mojo_benchmark

linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffd94917000)

libtinfo.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.6 (0x00007fe899cb1000)

libstdc++.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007fe899a00000)

libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007fe899921000)

libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007fe899c91000)

libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007fe899740000)

/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fe899d2c000)


$ ldd -d rust_benchmark

linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffde67b7000)

libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f8b3881b000)

libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f8b3863a000)

/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f8b388ae000)



Lets check the binary.
All the python non used built-ins are written to the binary, so does rust in this case.

mojo

rust




Steps until libc write:

Mojo



Rust


Ok wait, rustc like cargo by default is on debug-mode which is the slower version, the way to do cargo --release which is much faster is  rustc -O rust_benchmark.rs

real 0m0.107s
user 0m0.005s
sys 0m0.056s


This simple program don't make profit of the optimizations.


Rust


We reduced from 30 calls to 27.
I'm not going to criticize the number of calls because rust does his magic and result faster.

Mojo only 7 calls but runtime seems slower.

Regarding memory operations, seems that is rust like compiler-time borrow checked.

https://docs.modular.com/mojo/programming-manual.html#behavior-of-destructors


Rust decompiled


Rust disassembled





Mojo decompiled





Mojo disassembled



So we have two things: the crafted assembly speed, and specially the runtime speed.

Looking the Rust assembly, it's writing the string pointer to stack on every iteration which is same pointer in every iteration.

However Mojo loop is more optimized, param and address to call are pre-calculated before the loop.


So Mojo is generating optimized code, but its c++ API seems slower, at least the print() 

Regards.


















Related posts
  1. Pentest Tools Github
  2. Pentest Tools Bluekeep
  3. Hacking Tools And Software
  4. Pentest Tools Nmap
  5. Hacker Tools For Windows
  6. Pentest Tools Download
  7. Hacking Tools For Pc
  8. Hak5 Tools
  9. Hack Tools Mac
  10. Pentest Tools For Mac
  11. Tools Used For Hacking
  12. Pentest Tools Windows
  13. Hacker Tools Apk
  14. Pentest Tools
  15. Hacking Tools Windows 10
  16. Easy Hack Tools
  17. Hacker Tools Apk
  18. Hack Tool Apk No Root
  19. Usb Pentest Tools
  20. Pentest Tools Nmap
  21. What Is Hacking Tools
  22. Nsa Hack Tools
  23. Hack Tools Github
  24. Hacker Tools Online
  25. Pentest Tools Find Subdomains
  26. Hack Tool Apk
  27. Hacking Tools Pc
  28. Kik Hack Tools
  29. Hacker Tools Free
  30. Hacker Tools Free Download
  31. Hack Tool Apk No Root
  32. Pentest Tools Website Vulnerability
  33. Pentest Tools List
  34. Pentest Tools Free
  35. Hacker Tools For Mac
  36. Hacker Tools For Mac
  37. Pentest Tools For Ubuntu
  38. Hacking Tools For Windows 7
  39. Hacker Tools Apk Download
  40. Pentest Tools Nmap
  41. Pentest Tools Framework
  42. Kik Hack Tools
  43. Hacking Tools Name
  44. Game Hacking
  45. Github Hacking Tools
  46. Ethical Hacker Tools
  47. Pentest Tools Apk
  48. Hacker Tools List
  49. Hacking Tools Free Download
  50. Pentest Tools
  51. Pentest Tools Tcp Port Scanner
  52. Hack Tools
  53. Github Hacking Tools
  54. Hacker Tools For Mac
  55. Hacking Tools Mac
  56. Hack Tools For Ubuntu
  57. Pentest Tools Windows
  58. Tools For Hacker
  59. How To Hack
  60. Pentest Tools Alternative
  61. Top Pentest Tools
  62. Tools 4 Hack
  63. Best Hacking Tools 2020
  64. Bluetooth Hacking Tools Kali
  65. Hacking Tools Name
  66. Hacker Tools List
  67. Best Hacking Tools 2020
  68. Hacker Security Tools
  69. Best Pentesting Tools 2018
  70. Pentest Tools For Windows
  71. Hack Tools Download
  72. Hacking Tools Name
  73. Pentest Tools Review
  74. Pentest Tools Download
  75. Pentest Tools For Ubuntu
  76. Pentest Tools Framework
  77. Pentest Automation Tools
  78. Hacking Apps
  79. Hacking Tools For Windows 7
  80. Pentest Tools Open Source
  81. Pentest Tools Tcp Port Scanner
  82. Hack Tools Download
  83. Pentest Tools Website
  84. Pentest Box Tools Download
  85. How To Install Pentest Tools In Ubuntu
  86. Hacking Tools For Windows 7
  87. What Are Hacking Tools

No hay comentarios: